Does Prolotherapy Have an Effect on the Care of Pressure Injuries? a Pilot Study

dc.authorscopusid 57222197385
dc.authorscopusid 59306978500
dc.authorscopusid 59485633400
dc.authorscopusid 55898697800
dc.contributor.author Eroglu, Nermin
dc.contributor.author Kokkiz, Rukiye
dc.contributor.author Eroglu, Hatice Eda
dc.contributor.author Kocoglu, Hasan
dc.date.accessioned 2025-02-10T18:42:30Z
dc.date.available 2025-02-10T18:42:30Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.department Fenerbahçe University en_US
dc.department-temp [Eroglu, Nermin; Kokkiz, Rukiye] Fenerbahce Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Eroglu, Hatice Eda] Prof Doctor Suleyman Yalcin City Hosp, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Kocoglu, Hasan] Medeniyet Univ, Fac Med, Dept Surg Med Sci, Istanbul, Turkiye en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: This study contributes to wound healing with prolotherapy in people with pressure injuries. The study was planned and conducted as a randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of prolotherapy on the care of pressure injuries. Methods: The study was carried out with patients with pressure injuries in the intensive care unit of a city hospital between April and June 2023. A power analysis was performed, and the sample size was calculated as 20 patients, including 10 in the intervention and 10 in the control group. The patients in the experimental group were given wound care with gelofusine as prolotherapy in the morning and evening for three days, and the injury site was covered with a sterile sponge and fixation tape. The patients in the control group were treated with saline in the morning and evening for three days. In both groups, the wound width, depth, and length were measured and evaluated prior to each intervention for three days. Results: In the study, a significant difference was found between the mean ages of the participants in the experimental and control groups (p < 0.05). The decrease in width measurements in the experimental group was found to be statistically significant compared to the previous measurements, while the increase in width measurements in the control group was significant compared to the previous measurements (p < 0.05). Depth measurements decreased statistically significantly in the experimental group, while they increased significantly in the control group compared to previous measurement values (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In conclusion, it was determined that the administration of gelofusine for pressure injuries as prolotherapy in the experimental group may be more effective in wound healing than saline treatment applied in the control group. Further studies are warranted. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.citation 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.burns.2024.107352
dc.identifier.issn 0305-4179
dc.identifier.issn 1879-1409
dc.identifier.issue 2 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 39721238
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85212959836
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2024.107352
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14627/801
dc.identifier.volume 51 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001396595100001
dc.identifier.wosquality Q2
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier Sci Ltd en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 0
dc.subject Pressure Injury en_US
dc.subject Wound Care en_US
dc.subject Prolotherapy en_US
dc.subject Gelofusine en_US
dc.title Does Prolotherapy Have an Effect on the Care of Pressure Injuries? a Pilot Study en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 0
dspace.entity.type Publication

Files