Does Prolotherapy Have an Effect on the Care of Pressure Injuries? a Pilot Study

dc.authorscopusid57222197385
dc.authorscopusid59306978500
dc.authorscopusid59485633400
dc.authorscopusid55898697800
dc.contributor.authorEroglu, Nermin
dc.contributor.authorKokkiz, Rukiye
dc.contributor.authorEroglu, Hatice Eda
dc.contributor.authorKocoglu, Hasan
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-10T18:42:30Z
dc.date.available2025-02-10T18:42:30Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentFenerbahçe Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Eroglu, Nermin; Kokkiz, Rukiye] Fenerbahce Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Eroglu, Hatice Eda] Prof Doctor Suleyman Yalcin City Hosp, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Kocoglu, Hasan] Medeniyet Univ, Fac Med, Dept Surg Med Sci, Istanbul, Turkiyeen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study contributes to wound healing with prolotherapy in people with pressure injuries. The study was planned and conducted as a randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of prolotherapy on the care of pressure injuries. Methods: The study was carried out with patients with pressure injuries in the intensive care unit of a city hospital between April and June 2023. A power analysis was performed, and the sample size was calculated as 20 patients, including 10 in the intervention and 10 in the control group. The patients in the experimental group were given wound care with gelofusine as prolotherapy in the morning and evening for three days, and the injury site was covered with a sterile sponge and fixation tape. The patients in the control group were treated with saline in the morning and evening for three days. In both groups, the wound width, depth, and length were measured and evaluated prior to each intervention for three days. Results: In the study, a significant difference was found between the mean ages of the participants in the experimental and control groups (p < 0.05). The decrease in width measurements in the experimental group was found to be statistically significant compared to the previous measurements, while the increase in width measurements in the control group was significant compared to the previous measurements (p < 0.05). Depth measurements decreased statistically significantly in the experimental group, while they increased significantly in the control group compared to previous measurement values (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In conclusion, it was determined that the administration of gelofusine for pressure injuries as prolotherapy in the experimental group may be more effective in wound healing than saline treatment applied in the control group. Further studies are warranted.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.burns.2024.107352
dc.identifier.issn0305-4179
dc.identifier.issn1879-1409
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid39721238
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85212959836
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2024.107352
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14627/801
dc.identifier.volume51en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001396595100001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltden_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPressure Injuryen_US
dc.subjectWound Careen_US
dc.subjectProlotherapyen_US
dc.subjectGelofusineen_US
dc.titleDoes Prolotherapy Have an Effect on the Care of Pressure Injuries? a Pilot Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files