Coach Candidates' and Coaches' Nutrition Knowledge Affects Dietary Recommendations Indirectly: Mediator Effects of Self-Efficacy

dc.contributor.author Altinok, Oyku
dc.contributor.author Bas, Murat
dc.date.accessioned 2025-03-10T21:19:15Z
dc.date.available 2025-03-10T21:19:15Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description.abstract Background/Objectives: The nutritional knowledge and behavior of athletes are considerably influenced by the dietary recommendations of their coaches, which, in turn, affect their health and performance. In the context of social cognitive theory, this study examines the impact of general and sports nutrition knowledge (GeSNK), nutrition self-efficacy (NSE), and nutrition counseling self-efficacy (NCSE) on the dietary recommendations (DRs) provided by coach candidates and coaches (CC&Cs). Additionally, it explores variations in GeSNK, NSE, and NCSE among CC&Cs based on their sports positions, genders, and types of sports. Methods: This study included 70 coach candidates and 102 coaches, with data collected via validated scales for GeSNK, NSE, and NCSE. Using the PROCESS macro, the serial multiple mediator model was applied, and group comparisons were conducted via the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The results revealed that 36% of participants achieved adequate GeSNK scores, but only 6.4% abstained from providing DRs. Participants engaged in individual sports exhibited higher NSE and NCSE scores than those involved in team sports. Additionally, 22.7% of CC&Cs identified their former coaches as a primary source of nutrition information. The study findings revealed that GeSNK, NSE, and NCSE significantly influenced DRs, collectively accounting for 23% of the variance in DRs. The direct effect of NCSE on DRs was statistically significant, whereas the direct effects of GeSNK and NSE were not significant. GeSNK and NSE jointly explained only 41% of the variance in NCSE, suggesting that additional factors influencing NCSE and DRs remain unexplored. Conclusions: To address the issue of inadequate dietary recommendations stemming from insufficient information, it is crucial to identify and understand these additional factors affecting NCSE and DRs. Diversifying nutrition education programs to enhance the nutrition knowledge of CC&Cs is essential. Furthermore, fostering collaboration between CC&Cs and nutritionists can ensure that athletes receive accurate and comprehensive nutritional guidance. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/nu17030589
dc.identifier.issn 2072-6643
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85217525140
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17030589
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Mdpi en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Coach en_US
dc.subject Dietary Recommendation en_US
dc.subject Nutrition Knowledge en_US
dc.subject Nutrition Self-Efficacy en_US
dc.subject Nutrition Counselling Self-Efficacy en_US
dc.subject Social Cognitive Theory en_US
dc.title Coach Candidates' and Coaches' Nutrition Knowledge Affects Dietary Recommendations Indirectly: Mediator Effects of Self-Efficacy en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.wosid Baş, Murat/A-2929-2016
gdc.author.wosid Altınok, Öykü/Adu-3226-2022
gdc.description.department Fenerbahçe University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Altinok, Oyku] Fenerbahce Univ, Dept Nutr & Dietet, Fac Hlth Sci, TR-34758 Istanbul, Turkiye; [Bas, Murat] Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Nutr & Dietet, TR-34752 Istanbul, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.issue 3 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.volume 17 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q1
gdc.identifier.pmid 39940449
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001418728500001
gdc.scopus.citedcount 0
gdc.wos.citedcount 0

Files