Coach Candidates’ and Coaches’ Nutrition Knowledge Affects Dietary Recommendations Indirectly: Mediator Effects of Self-Efficacy

dc.authorscopusid59552283800
dc.authorscopusid59096505100
dc.contributor.authorAltınok, Ö.
dc.contributor.authorBaş, M.
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-10T21:19:15Z
dc.date.available2025-03-10T21:19:15Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentFenerbahçe Universityen_US
dc.department-tempAltınok Ö., Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Science, Fenerbahce University, Istanbul, 34758, Türkiye; Baş M., Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Science, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, 34752, Türkiyeen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objectives: The nutritional knowledge and behavior of athletes are considerably influenced by the dietary recommendations of their coaches, which, in turn, affect their health and performance. In the context of social cognitive theory, this study examines the impact of general and sports nutrition knowledge (GeSNK), nutrition self-efficacy (NSE), and nutrition counseling self-efficacy (NCSE) on the dietary recommendations (DRs) provided by coach candidates and coaches (CC&Cs). Additionally, it explores variations in GeSNK, NSE, and NCSE among CC&Cs based on their sports positions, genders, and types of sports. Methods: This study included 70 coach candidates and 102 coaches, with data collected via validated scales for GeSNK, NSE, and NCSE. Using the PROCESS macro, the serial multiple mediator model was applied, and group comparisons were conducted via the Mann–Whitney U test. Results: The results revealed that 36% of participants achieved adequate GeSNK scores, but only 6.4% abstained from providing DRs. Participants engaged in individual sports exhibited higher NSE and NCSE scores than those involved in team sports. Additionally, 22.7% of CC&Cs identified their former coaches as a primary source of nutrition information. The study findings revealed that GeSNK, NSE, and NCSE significantly influenced DRs, collectively accounting for 23% of the variance in DRs. The direct effect of NCSE on DRs was statistically significant, whereas the direct effects of GeSNK and NSE were not significant. GeSNK and NSE jointly explained only 41% of the variance in NCSE, suggesting that additional factors influencing NCSE and DRs remain unexplored. Conclusions: To address the issue of inadequate dietary recommendations stemming from insufficient information, it is crucial to identify and understand these additional factors affecting NCSE and DRs. Diversifying nutrition education programs to enhance the nutrition knowledge of CC&Cs is essential. Furthermore, fostering collaboration between CC&Cs and nutritionists can ensure that athletes receive accurate and comprehensive nutritional guidance. © 2025 by the authors.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/nu17030589
dc.identifier.issn2072-6643
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85217525140
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/nu17030589
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14627/872
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofNutrientsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount0
dc.subjectCoachen_US
dc.subjectDietary Recommendationen_US
dc.subjectNutrition Counselling Self-Efficacyen_US
dc.subjectNutrition Knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectNutrition Self-Efficacyen_US
dc.subjectSocial Cognitive Theoryen_US
dc.titleCoach Candidates’ and Coaches’ Nutrition Knowledge Affects Dietary Recommendations Indirectly: Mediator Effects of Self-Efficacyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files