Comparison of <i>in Vitro</I> Antifungal Activity Methods Using Extract of Chitinase-Producing <i>aeromonas</I> Sp. Bhc02

dc.contributor.author Cadirci, Bilge Hilal
dc.contributor.author Yilmaz, Gulesme
dc.contributor.other Tıbbi Hizmetler ve Teknikler Bölümü
dc.date.accessioned 2025-01-11T13:04:12Z
dc.date.available 2025-01-11T13:04:12Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.description CADIRCI, Bilge/0000-0003-1525-9608 en_US
dc.description.abstract Biological control to prevent fungal plant diseases offers an alternative approach to facilitate sustainable agriculture. Since the chitin in fungal cell walls is a target for biocontrol agents, chitinases are one of the important antifungal molecules. In this study, the aim was to investigate a new chitinase isolated from a fluvial soil bacterium and to show the antifungal activity of the characterized chitinase by comparing the three common methods. The bacterium with the highest chitinase activity was identified as Aeromonas sp. by 16 S rRNA sequence analysis. Following the determination of the optimum enzyme production time, the enzyme was partially purified, and the physicochemical parameters of the enzyme were investigated. In the antifungal studies, direct Aeromonas sp. BHC02 cells or partially purified chitinase were used. As a result, in the first method in which the Aeromonas sp. BHC02 cells were spread on the surface of petri dishes, no zone formation was observed around the test fungi spotted on the surface. However, zone formation was observed in the methods in which the antifungal activity was investigated using the partially purified chitinase enzyme. For example, in the second method, the enzyme was spread on the surface of PDA, and zone formation was observed only around Penicillum species among the test fungi spotted on the surface. In the third method, in which the necessary time was given for the formation of mycelium of the test fungi, it was observed that the growth of Fusarium solani, Alternaria alternata and Botrytis cinerea was inhibited by the partially purified chitinase. This study concludes that the results of the antifungal activities depend on the method used and all fungal chitins cannot be degraded with one strain's chitinase. Depending on the variety of chitin, some fungi can be more resistant. en_US
dc.identifier.citation 1
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10930-023-10098-5
dc.identifier.issn 1572-3887
dc.identifier.issn 1875-8355
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85149639460
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-023-10098-5
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14627/322
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Chitinase en_US
dc.subject Antifungal Activity en_US
dc.subject Aeromanas Sp en_US
dc.subject Biocontrol en_US
dc.title Comparison of <i>in Vitro</I> Antifungal Activity Methods Using Extract of Chitinase-Producing <i>aeromonas</I> Sp. Bhc02 en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id CADIRCI, Bilge/0000-0003-1525-9608
gdc.author.institutional Kızıltaş, Gülesme
gdc.author.scopusid 15130737100
gdc.author.scopusid 57204473386
gdc.author.wosid CADIRCI, Bilge/AAA-9642-2021
gdc.description.department Fenerbahçe University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Cadirci, Bilge Hilal] Tokat Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Dept Crop Protect, Tokat, Turkiye; [Yilmaz, Gulesme] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Bioengn, Ankara, Turkiye; [Yilmaz, Gulesme] Fenerbahce Univ, Vocat Sch Hlth Serv, Med Lab Tech, Istanbul, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.endpage 134 en_US
gdc.description.issue 2 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q3
gdc.description.startpage 125 en_US
gdc.description.volume 42 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q3
gdc.identifier.pmid 36892743
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000951531600001
gdc.scopus.citedcount 4
gdc.wos.citedcount 3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 95935bf3-a292-459a-88a3-00065692214e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 95935bf3-a292-459a-88a3-00065692214e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 71e25e1a-470b-4aba-b574-5311c2551e2d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 71e25e1a-470b-4aba-b574-5311c2551e2d

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparison_of_in_vitro_Antifungal_Activity_Methods.pdf
Size:
740.36 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format