Determining the Effects of Nasopharyngeal Suction With Negative and Positive Pressure: Randomised Controlled Trial

dc.contributor.author Kökkız, Rukiye
dc.contributor.author Okuroglu, Guelten Karahan
dc.contributor.author Ustun, Nuran
dc.contributor.other Tıbbi Hizmetler ve Teknikler Bölümü
dc.date.accessioned 2025-01-11T13:03:27Z
dc.date.available 2025-01-11T13:03:27Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.department Fenerbahçe University en_US
dc.department-temp [Kokkiz, Rukiye] Fenerbahce Univ, Dept Nursing, Fac Hlth & Sci, Atasehir, Turkiye; [Kokkiz, Rukiye] Marmara Univ, Dept Nursing, Inst Hlth Sci, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Okuroglu, Guelten Karahan] Marmara Univ, Dept Pediat Nursing, Fac Hlth Sci, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Ustun, Nuran] Istanbul Medeniyet Univ, Fac Med, Dept Child Hlth & Dis, Istanbul, Turkiye en_US
dc.description.abstract Objective: The study aims to determine the effects of nasopharyngeal suction with negative and positive pressure on pain level, respiratory parameters, and mucosal irritation in infants. Methods: This study was conducted as a posttest randomized controlled experimental research. The data was collected at G & ouml;ztepe Training and Research Hospital between January and November 2020. While the positive pressure suction method was applied to the experimental group, the negative pressure suction method was applied to the control group. Results: It is determined that the pain level mean scores at the 1 st and 5 th minutes after the suction procedure are lower in the experimental group than in the control group (p=0.01). p =0.01). SpO2 values at the 1st, st , 5th, th , and 15th th minutes after the procedure are significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (p=0.01). p =0.01). There is no statistically significant difference in the respiratory rate values between experimental and control groups (p>0.05). p >0.05). Conclusion: It is determined that the post-procedure pain level is lower and the SpO2 value is higher in the experimental group (positive pressure suction) compared to the control group (negative pressure suction). Both methods do not cause mucosal irritation, as well. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Emerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.citation 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1307169
dc.identifier.endpage 690 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2459-1459
dc.identifier.issue 3 en_US
dc.identifier.scopusquality N/A
dc.identifier.startpage 683 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 1267979
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1307169
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14627/274
dc.identifier.volume 14 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001340200900007
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Marmara Univ, inst Health Sciences en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Infant en_US
dc.subject Mucosal Irritation en_US
dc.subject Pain en_US
dc.subject Respiratory Parameters en_US
dc.subject Suction en_US
dc.title Determining the Effects of Nasopharyngeal Suction With Negative and Positive Pressure: Randomised Controlled Trial en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 0
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 4bd0591a-b93d-4793-9024-48615d1c0dbf
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 4bd0591a-b93d-4793-9024-48615d1c0dbf
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 71e25e1a-470b-4aba-b574-5311c2551e2d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 71e25e1a-470b-4aba-b574-5311c2551e2d

Files