Determining the Effects of Nasopharyngeal Suction With Negative and Positive Pressure: Randomised Controlled Trial

dc.contributor.authorKökkız, Rukiye
dc.contributor.authorOkuroglu, Guelten Karahan
dc.contributor.authorUstun, Nuran
dc.contributor.otherTıbbi Hizmetler ve Teknikler Bölümü
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-11T13:03:27Z
dc.date.available2025-01-11T13:03:27Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentFenerbahçe Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Kokkiz, Rukiye] Fenerbahce Univ, Dept Nursing, Fac Hlth & Sci, Atasehir, Turkiye; [Kokkiz, Rukiye] Marmara Univ, Dept Nursing, Inst Hlth Sci, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Okuroglu, Guelten Karahan] Marmara Univ, Dept Pediat Nursing, Fac Hlth Sci, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Ustun, Nuran] Istanbul Medeniyet Univ, Fac Med, Dept Child Hlth & Dis, Istanbul, Turkiyeen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The study aims to determine the effects of nasopharyngeal suction with negative and positive pressure on pain level, respiratory parameters, and mucosal irritation in infants. Methods: This study was conducted as a posttest randomized controlled experimental research. The data was collected at G & ouml;ztepe Training and Research Hospital between January and November 2020. While the positive pressure suction method was applied to the experimental group, the negative pressure suction method was applied to the control group. Results: It is determined that the pain level mean scores at the 1 st and 5 th minutes after the suction procedure are lower in the experimental group than in the control group (p=0.01). p =0.01). SpO2 values at the 1st, st , 5th, th , and 15th th minutes after the procedure are significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (p=0.01). p =0.01). There is no statistically significant difference in the respiratory rate values between experimental and control groups (p>0.05). p >0.05). Conclusion: It is determined that the post-procedure pain level is lower and the SpO2 value is higher in the experimental group (positive pressure suction) compared to the control group (negative pressure suction). Both methods do not cause mucosal irritation, as well.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexEmerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1307169
dc.identifier.endpage690en_US
dc.identifier.issn2459-1459
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage683en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1267979
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1307169
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14627/274
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001340200900007
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMarmara Univ, inst Health Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectInfanten_US
dc.subjectMucosal Irritationen_US
dc.subjectPainen_US
dc.subjectRespiratory Parametersen_US
dc.subjectSuctionen_US
dc.titleDetermining the Effects of Nasopharyngeal Suction With Negative and Positive Pressure: Randomised Controlled Trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount0
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4bd0591a-b93d-4793-9024-48615d1c0dbf
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4bd0591a-b93d-4793-9024-48615d1c0dbf
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication71e25e1a-470b-4aba-b574-5311c2551e2d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery71e25e1a-470b-4aba-b574-5311c2551e2d

Files