Effects of Triphasic Training Model Combined With Two Different Cluster Sets on Vertical Jump and Reactive Strength Index

dc.authoridKAYA, SELMAN/0000-0002-2185-6436
dc.authorwosidPinar, Salih/AEY-5633-2022
dc.authorwosidKAYA, SELMAN/HLH-6254-2023
dc.contributor.authorPınar, Salih
dc.contributor.authorPinar, Salih
dc.contributor.otherAntrenörlük Eğitimi Bölümü
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-11T13:00:36Z
dc.date.available2025-01-11T13:00:36Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentFenerbahçe Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Kaya, Selman] Yalova Univ, Fac Sport Sci, Yalova, Turkey; [Pinar, Salih] Fenerbahce Univ, Fac Sport Sci, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionKAYA, SELMAN/0000-0002-2185-6436en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground and Study Aim This study aims to examine the effects of the Triphasic Training Model (TTM) applied with different set designs (15-30 sec intra-set) on reactive strength index (RSI) and vertical jump values. Material and Methods Sixteen male athletes over 18 with at least three years of strength training experience (2 days a week) actively engaged in sports participated in the study. The study group was divided into two groups by calculating the relative strengths. The 15-second cluster set (C15) group exercises were performed with 15 seconds of rest between repetitions, and the 30-second cluster-set (C30) group practiced the exercises with 30 seconds of rest between repetitions. The triphasic training model was applied to all study groups for six weeks. Countermovement jump (CMJ) and drop jump tests were performed on the athletes before and after the training. Optojump brand photocell system was used for CMJ and RSI tests. For the RSI test, the desk height was determined as 40cm. Kolmogorov-Smirnov values were examined to assess the homogeneity of the data. To compare the means between groups, ANOVA was used for Repeated Measures, and a t-test was used to compare the pretest-posttest mean of the groups. The statistical significance level was determined as p<0.05. Results After triphasic training, CMJ and RSI values of both C15 and C30 groups increased (p<0.05). When the within-group pretest-posttest values were examined, it was seen that the C30 group showed more improvement than the C15 group. Conclusions As a result, it was seen that the triphasic training model applied twice a week for six weeks improved the CMJ and RSI values of the athletes, and it was more effective to use C30 instead of C15 in the use of cluster sets.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexEmerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.15561/20755279.2022.0404
dc.identifier.endpage195en_US
dc.identifier.issn2075-5279
dc.identifier.issn2308-7250
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage188en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2022.0404
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14627/42
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000968131000002
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIermakov S Sen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTriphasic Trainingen_US
dc.subjectCluster Seten_US
dc.subjectReactive Strength Indexen_US
dc.subjectVertical Jumpen_US
dc.subjectPoweren_US
dc.titleEffects of Triphasic Training Model Combined With Two Different Cluster Sets on Vertical Jump and Reactive Strength Indexen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount0
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf3ee5638-91ba-4d17-85bc-5f80ba8ddf97
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf3ee5638-91ba-4d17-85bc-5f80ba8ddf97
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication535096c7-d229-40a5-a4dc-139f73c8e8be
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery535096c7-d229-40a5-a4dc-139f73c8e8be

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
sergiiJournaleditor05-SelmanKaya1.pdf
Size:
370.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format