Effects of Triphasic Training Model Combined With Two Different Cluster Sets on Vertical Jump and Reactive Strength Index

dc.authorid KAYA, SELMAN/0000-0002-2185-6436
dc.authorwosid Pinar, Salih/AEY-5633-2022
dc.authorwosid KAYA, SELMAN/HLH-6254-2023
dc.contributor.author Pınar, Salih
dc.contributor.author Pinar, Salih
dc.contributor.other Antrenörlük Eğitimi Bölümü
dc.date.accessioned 2025-01-11T13:00:36Z
dc.date.available 2025-01-11T13:00:36Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.department Fenerbahçe University en_US
dc.department-temp [Kaya, Selman] Yalova Univ, Fac Sport Sci, Yalova, Turkey; [Pinar, Salih] Fenerbahce Univ, Fac Sport Sci, Istanbul, Turkey en_US
dc.description KAYA, SELMAN/0000-0002-2185-6436 en_US
dc.description.abstract Background and Study Aim This study aims to examine the effects of the Triphasic Training Model (TTM) applied with different set designs (15-30 sec intra-set) on reactive strength index (RSI) and vertical jump values. Material and Methods Sixteen male athletes over 18 with at least three years of strength training experience (2 days a week) actively engaged in sports participated in the study. The study group was divided into two groups by calculating the relative strengths. The 15-second cluster set (C15) group exercises were performed with 15 seconds of rest between repetitions, and the 30-second cluster-set (C30) group practiced the exercises with 30 seconds of rest between repetitions. The triphasic training model was applied to all study groups for six weeks. Countermovement jump (CMJ) and drop jump tests were performed on the athletes before and after the training. Optojump brand photocell system was used for CMJ and RSI tests. For the RSI test, the desk height was determined as 40cm. Kolmogorov-Smirnov values were examined to assess the homogeneity of the data. To compare the means between groups, ANOVA was used for Repeated Measures, and a t-test was used to compare the pretest-posttest mean of the groups. The statistical significance level was determined as p<0.05. Results After triphasic training, CMJ and RSI values of both C15 and C30 groups increased (p<0.05). When the within-group pretest-posttest values were examined, it was seen that the C30 group showed more improvement than the C15 group. Conclusions As a result, it was seen that the triphasic training model applied twice a week for six weeks improved the CMJ and RSI values of the athletes, and it was more effective to use C30 instead of C15 in the use of cluster sets. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Emerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.citation 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.15561/20755279.2022.0404
dc.identifier.endpage 195 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2075-5279
dc.identifier.issn 2308-7250
dc.identifier.issue 4 en_US
dc.identifier.scopusquality N/A
dc.identifier.startpage 188 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2022.0404
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14627/42
dc.identifier.volume 26 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000968131000002
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Iermakov S S en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Triphasic Training en_US
dc.subject Cluster Set en_US
dc.subject Reactive Strength Index en_US
dc.subject Vertical Jump en_US
dc.subject Power en_US
dc.title Effects of Triphasic Training Model Combined With Two Different Cluster Sets on Vertical Jump and Reactive Strength Index en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 0
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication f3ee5638-91ba-4d17-85bc-5f80ba8ddf97
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery f3ee5638-91ba-4d17-85bc-5f80ba8ddf97
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 535096c7-d229-40a5-a4dc-139f73c8e8be
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 535096c7-d229-40a5-a4dc-139f73c8e8be

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
sergiiJournaleditor05-SelmanKaya1.pdf
Size:
370.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format