WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14627/6
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Article Machine Learning Model for Predicting Multidrug Resistance in Clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates(MDPI, 2026) Akkaya, Yuksel; Aydin, Irfan; Tanyildizi-Kokkulunk, Handan; Erturk, Ayse; Kilic, Ibrahim HalilBackground/Objectives: Klebsiella pneumoniae is an opportunistic pathogen increasingly resistant to carbapenems and broad-spectrum antibiotics, complicating timely infection management. In critical cases like septic shock, where initiating effective antibiotics within 3 h improves survival, culture-based resistance testing is often too slow. This study evaluates machine learning (ML) algorithms for faster antimicrobial resistance prediction than conventional methods. Methods: In this retrospective study, antibiogram results of 607 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates collected between 2017 and 2024 were combined with demographic and clinical information of the patients from whom the isolates were obtained. Four different ML algorithms, namely Decision Tree (DT), Support Vector Classifier (SVC), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Random Forest (RF), were applied to classify the resistance status for 22 antibiotics. Model performances were evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F-score, AUC and feature importance metrics. Results: The RF model showed the highest overall performance in accurately predicting resistance to 22 antibiotics, achieving an average AUC value of 0.96. In particular, it predicted resistance to treatment-critical antibiotics such as Ertapenem (100%), Imipenem (93%) and Meropenem (95%) with high accuracy. Conclusions: ML models, especially RF, offer a powerful tool for rapid antibiotic resistance prediction, supporting accurate empirical treatment decisions and antimicrobial stewardship.Article Citation - WoS: 6Citation - Scopus: 6Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Practice: A Qualitative Study of Nurses' Perspectives on Opportunities, Challenges, and Ethical Implications(BMC, 2025) Bodur, Gonul; Cakir, Hanife; Turan, Suzan; Seren, Arzu Kader Harmanci; Goktas, PolatBackgroundThe study aims to explore nurses' views on the effects of artificial intelligence (AI) in nursing, focusing on their understanding, practical applications, ethical considerations, and perceived opportunities and threats.MethodsThis qualitative study used semi\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:-$$\end{document}structured interviews to gain comprehensive insights from clinical nurses, adhering to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research for methodological rigor. After obtaining ethical approval, researchers conducted semi\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:-$$\end{document}structured interviews with 25 clinical nurses. The interviews explored nurses' perceptions of AI, including its basic concepts, applications in nursing practice, ethical and social implications, and potential benefits and drawbacks.ResultsThe analysis identified four overarching themes: (1) Nurses' Conceptualizations of Artificial Intelligence, (2) Opportunities of AI in Nursing Practice, (3) Threats of AI in Nursing Practice, and (4) Ethical and Psychological Concerns in AI-Based Nursing Practice. The findings revealed that nurses had a foundational understanding of AI and its definitions. They acknowledged both the positive and negative impacts of AI technologies on their practice. Nurses expressed that AI could reduce workload, enhance patient care, and improve efficiency. However, they also articulated significant threats, including concerns over professional redundancy, emotional disconnection in caregiving, de-skilling, and the risk of dehumanizing the healthcare environment. Additionally, ethical and psychological concerns emerged, such as ambiguity in accountability, threats to data security and patient safety, unsuitability in psychiatric care contexts, staff surveillance anxiety, and risks of misuse or systemic bias.ConclusionThe study concluded that while nurses possess a basic understanding of AI, the effective and ethical integration of AI technologies in nursing requires targeted training, institutional preparedness, and robust interdisciplinary collaboration. To ensure AI complements rather than compromises nursing values, it is imperative to equip nurses with skills in digital literacy, ethical reasoning, and critical engagement with AI tools. The findings highlight the necessity of structured education programs and policy development that address both the technological and humanistic dimensions of AI use in healthcare. Future research should actively incorporate patient and public voices to ensure that AI-driven transformations in care remain aligned with the principles of patient-centeredness and human dignity.