WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14627/6
Browse
Search Results
Article Burn Rehabilitation: Evaluation of Physiotherapists' Knowledge and Awareness Levels(Elsevier Sci Ltd, 2025) Seyyah, Mine; Akkurt, Mustafa Ferit; Yilmaz, NergisObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of knowledge and awareness of physiotherapists working in Turkey about burn rehabilitation. Method: This was a cross-sectional study conducted between March and June 2025 and data were collected using Google Form. A total of 324 people were included in the study. The level of knowledge and awareness of the participants about burn rehabilitation was evaluated with 28 questions created by taking expert opinion. Results: While 25.6 % of participants had experience in burn rehabilitation, only 1.2 % frequently encountered burn patients. Although 60.5 % had taken courses on burn rehabilitation, only 15.1 % considered their knowledge sufficient. Correct response rates to key knowledge questions were 78.7 % for exercise applicability, 79.6 % for timing, 54.6 % for the most common burn type in Turkey, 35.8 % for edema management, and 13 % for pressure garment duration, revealing gaps in clinical knowledge. Additionally, 92.9 % believed early physiotherapy improves recovery, and 98.4 % reported positive effects on quality of life. Discussion: Our results indicate that although most physiotherapists had taken courses on burn rehabilitation, their knowledge remains insufficient, whereas their awareness is high, underscoring the need for targeted training and certification programs.Article Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the Kidney Transplant Understanding Tool (K-TUT) in Kidney Transplant Recipients(Elsevier, 2025) Akinci, Naile; Genc, Kadriye Nilay; Toprak, CaglaAim: The study was conducted methodologically to evaluate the validity and reliability of the KTUT scale in kidney transplant recipients. Material and Method: The population of the study consisted of kidney transplant patients at a private hospital group in Istanbul, while the sample comprised patients who met the inclusion criteria and volunteered for the study. Based on ten times the number of scale items, 220 individuals were included in the sample to prevent data loss and to ensure high representativeness. In the study, data collection tools such as the "Patient Information Form" and the "KTUT" scale were employed. The test-retest study was repeated two weeks later with 50 participants. The participants in the retest were not included in other tests of the scale. Findings: The overall content validity index of the scale (S-CVI/Ave) was found to be 0.93. According to the experts' opinions, the content validity of the scale is high, and the majority of the items have been deemed appropriate for the measurement purpose. The internal consistency reliability coefficient of the scale (Cronbach's Alpha) was calculated as 0.789. This threshold indicates that the scale possesses an acceptable level of reliability for use at the group level. In addition, the results of the study reveal that the scores of the K-TUT scale show a significant difference in the 27 % lower and 27 % upper groups. Conclusion: As a result of the study, the K-TUT scale has been shown to reliably distinguish knowledge levels and to be an effective measurement tool in the field of kidney transplant. It is thought that using the Turkish version of the K-TUT to evaluate the knowledge levels of kidney transplant recipients will contribute to evaluation of developed programs and the improvement of patients' treatment processes.
