WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14627/6

Browse

Filters

2024 - 20253

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Balikci, AymenWoS Q: search.filters.wosQuartile.Q2

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Conference Object
    The Homeostasis-Enrichment (HEP®) Approach: A Novel Early Intervention Model for OT
    (Amer Occupational Therapy Assoc, Inc, 2025) Balikci, Aymen; Sirma, Gamze Cagla; May-Benson, Teresa A.
  • Article
    Effects of the HEP® (Homeostasis-Enrichment Approach in Preterm Infants with Increased Developmental Risk: A Randomized Controlled Study
    (Frontiers Media S.A., 2025) Sirma, Gamze Cagla; Zengin Alpozgen, Ayse; Balikci, Aymen
    Background and objectives: This study investigated the effectiveness of the Homeostasis-Enrichment-Plasticity (HEP) Approach in preterm infants with increased developmental risk, compared to the Traditional Treatment (TT) intervention for physical and occupational therapy.<br /> Materials and methods: Twenty-nine preterm infants (adjusted age, 4-10 months) were randomly assigned to two groups: the HEP Approach group and the TT group. The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 (PDMS-2), Test of Sensory Functions in Infants (TSFI), and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) were administered pre-and post-intervention. The intervention was implemented weekly for 12 weeks.<br /> Results: The baseline characteristics of the infants were similar. At the end of the treatment, a significant time effect was observed in motor skills and sensory functions across both groups, with improvements in all PDMS-2 and TSFI subtests (p < 0.05). Significant time x group interactions showed greater improvements in the HEP Approach group compared to the TT group for Fine Motor Quotient: F = 10.818, p = 0.003; Gross Motor Quotient: F = 5.691, p = 0.024; and Total Motor Quotient: F = 21.109, p < 0.001. For TSFI, the HEP Approach group showed greater improvements in Adaptive Motor Functions (F = 13.794, p = 0.001), Visual-Tactile Integration (F = 7.410, p = 0.011), and Total score (F = 11.316, p = 0.002). No significant time*group interactions were found for Reactivity to Tactile Deep Pressure, Ocular Motor Control, and Reactivity to Vestibular Stimulation (p > 0.05). Parental anxiety, measured by BAI, decreased significantly in both groups (F = 8.72, p = 0.006), but no significant time x group interaction was found (p > 0.05), indicating similar reductions in both groups. Conclusion: The HEP Approach demonstrated superior outcomes compared to the TT intervention in improving motor skills and sensory functions in preterm infants, while both interventions reduced caregiver anxiety.
  • Article
    Citation - WoS: 3
    Citation - Scopus: 2
    Hep® (homeostasis-Enrichment Approach Changes Sensory-Motor Development Trajectory and Improves Parental Goals: a Single Subject Study of an Infant With Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy and Twin Anemia Polycythemia Sequence (taps)
    (Mdpi, 2024) Balikci, Aymen; May-Benson, Teresa A.; Sirma, Gamze Cagla; Ilbay, Gul
    Background: Early intervention (EI) for infants identified as being at high risk for cerebral palsy (CP), or who have been diagnosed with it, is critical for promotion of postnatal brain organization. The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of the Homeostasis-Enrichment-Plasticity (HEP) Approach, which is a contemporary EI model that applies the key principles of enriched environment paradigms and neuronal plasticity from experimental animal studies to ecological theories of human development on the motor development, sensory functions, and parental goals of an infant with twin anemia polycythemia sequence (TAPS) and CP. Methods: An AB phase with follow-up single case study design which consisted of multiple baseline assessments with the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 (PDMS-2) and the Test of Sensory Functions in Infants (TSFI) was used. Non-overlapping confidence intervals analysis was used for pre-post PDMS-2 scores. The measurement of progress toward goals and objectives was conducted using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). The HEP Approach intervention consisted of 12 one-hour sessions implemented over a period of 3 months, where a physical therapist provided weekly clinic-based parental coaching. Results: Results found a stable baseline during Phase A and improvement in response to the HEP Approach intervention during Phase B in both the PDMS-2 and TSFI according to 2SD Band analysis. The confidence intervals for the PDMS-2 scores also indicated a significant improvement after HEP intervention. The scores for both the PDMS-2 and the TSFI were consistent or showed improvement throughout the Follow-Up phase. A GAS t-score of 77.14 indicated that the infant exceeded intervention goal expectations. Conclusions: Although our findings suggest that the HEP Approach intervention has promise in enhancing sensory functions, motor skill outcomes, and parental goals in an infant with TAPS and CP, further research is required to validate and apply these results more broadly.