WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14627/6

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Article
    A Data-Efficient Machine Learning Approach for Breast Ultrasound Lesion Classification Integrating Image-Derived Features and Sonographic Descriptors
    (MDPI, 2026) Karacor, Adil Gursel; Sahin, Sevim
    Background/Objectives: Breast ultrasound is widely used for the diagnostic evaluation of breast lesions; however, reliable lesion characterization remains challenging due to substantial image heterogeneity and the limited size of most clinically available datasets. These constraints reduce the generalizability of end-to-end deep learning approaches in routine practice. The objective of this study was to evaluate a data-efficient diagnostic framework that integrates image-derived features with clinical sonographic descriptors to improve breast ultrasound lesion classification in small cohorts. Methods: Ultrasound images from the publicly available BrEaST-Lesions dataset were processed using a pretrained convolutional neural network to extract compact image feature representations from full images, lesion masks, and cropped tumor regions. These features were combined with manually recorded sonographic descriptors after label encoding to form a unified tabular dataset. Gradient-boosted tree models were trained using descriptor-only and fused feature sets with fivefold stratified cross-validation and evaluated on an independent external hold-out test set. Results: Using sonographic descriptors alone, the best-performing model (LightGBM) achieved an external validation accuracy of 0.88, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.95. Incorporation of image-derived features improved diagnostic performance on the external test set, yielding an accuracy of 0.88, an AUC of 0.96, and a sensitivity of 1.00 for malignant lesion detection. The fused framework demonstrated more stable generalization than descriptor-only models, particularly for malignant cases. Conclusions: Combining image-derived features with clinical sonographic descriptors within a tabular learning framework provides a robust and data-efficient approach for breast ultrasound-based lesion classification. This strategy supports diagnostic decision-making in small ultrasound datasets and represents a clinically realistic alternative when large-scale deep learning models are impractical.
  • Article
    Citation - WoS: 4
    Effect of Multileaf Collimator Leaf Position Error Determined by Picket Fence Test on Gamma Index Value in Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Plans
    (Springernature, 2021) Ceylan, Cemile; Inal, Serpil Yondem; Senol, Elif; Yilmaz, Berrin; Sahin, Sevim
    Aim The correlation between the MLC QA (IBA Dosimetry, Germany) results of the picket fence test created with intentional errors and the patient's quality assurance (QA) evaluation was investigated to assess the impact of multileaf collimator (MLC) positioning error on patient QA. Materials and methods The picket fence, including error-free and intentional MLC errors, defined in Bank In, Bank Out, and Bank Both were analyzed using MLC QA. The QA of 15 plans consisting of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and conventionally fractionated volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) acquired with electronic portal imaging devices (EPID) was evaluated in the presence of error-free and MLC errors. The QA of plans were analyzed with 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm criteria. Results The passing rates of the picket fence test were 97%, 92%, 91%, and 87% for error-free and intentional errors. The criterion of 3%/3 mm wasn't able to detect an MLC error for either SRS/SBRT or conventionally fractionated VMAT. The criterion of 2%/2mm was more sensitive to detect MLC error for the conventionally fractionated VMAT than SRS/SBRT. While only two of SBRT plans had <90%, four of conventionally fractionated VMAT plans had a <90% passing rate. Conclusion We found that the systematic MLC positioning errors defined with picket fence have a smaller but measurable impact on SRS/SBRT than the VMAT plan for a conventionally fractionated and relatively complex plan such as head and neck and endometrium cases.