Browsing by Author "Ozdincler, Arzu Razak"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5

Citation - WoS: 2
The Effectiveness of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Upper Extremity Muscle Strength: a Systematic Review
(Georg Thieme verlag Kg, 2024) Yazgan, Elif Aleyna; Atli, Ecenur; Ozdincler, Arzu Razak; Fizyoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü
Objective This systematic review aims to investigate the effect of blood flow restriction training (BFRT) on upper extremity muscle strength in pathological conditions of the upper extremity musculoskeletal system or in healthy individuals. Materials and Methods This study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guideline statement. The randomized controlled studies which published from January 2000 to May 2022 were searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Inclusion criteria were healthy clinical population or musculoskeletal pathology related to the upper extremity, participants aged 18 and above, application of blood flow restriction to the arm, a randomized controlled study design, and publication in English. Additionally, the presentation of upper extremity muscle strength as an outcome measurement was required. The quality of the studies was evaluated using The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. Articles that were non-randomized, inaccessible in full text, and scored 4 or below on the PEDro scale were excluded. Results Five studies were included with 219 participants. The included studies had PEDro scores ranging from 5 to 8, with an average score of 6.4. This review demonstrated a positive or neutral effect of BFRT on grip strength and shoulder strength. Conclusion Although some studies have reported positive effects of BFRT on upper extremity muscle strength, there is no conclusive evidence regarding the protocol to be used for increasing upper extremity muscle strength.
The Effectiveness of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Techniques Versus Conventional Therapy in Patients With Proximal Humerus Fracture: Randomized Controlled Trial
(Taylor & Francis Inc, 2025) Kus, Gamze; Alpozgen, Ayse Zengin; Ozdincler, Arzu Razak; Gungor, Feray; Altun, Suleyman; Fizyoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü
Background To date, no study has investigated the effectiveness of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) techniques for patients with proximal humerus fractures (PHF). Objective To compare the effect of PNF, conventional physicaltherapy (CPT) on shoulder passive and active range of motion (ROM), function, muscle strength, pain, kinesiophobia, quality of life (QoL), and patient satisfaction in patients with PHF. Methods A total of 40 patients with PHF were randomly allocated into two groups of CPT and PNF. Both groups received treatment programs three times a week for 6 weeks. The primary measures were shoulder ROM, function, and muscle strength. The secondary measures were pain, kinesiophobia, QoL, and patient satisfaction. Results Forty patients analyzed at the end of the study. There were no statistically significant group-by-time interactions for function, pain, shoulder ROM (active and passive), or muscle strength (p > .05). However, there were statistically significant group-by-time interactions in role limitations due to physical health subscale of the 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36) in CPT (p = .046, eta(2)(p) = 0.078). In addition, a significant difference was found in patient satisfaction at 3 weeks in CPT (p = .021) but no difference at 6 weeks between groups (p > .05). Conclusion The PNF techniques demonstrated similar outcomes to the CPT in reducing pain, improving function and shoulder ROM, and enhancing quality of life in patients with PHF in short time. According to our findings, PNF techniques are as effective as CPT and can be proposed as a potential adjunctive treatment for patients with PHF. Clinicaltrialnumber NCT05960435
Effects of Motor Imagery Adding To Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Program in Children With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Does It Make a Difference
(Elsevier Sci Ltd, 2025) Umut, Gulsena Utku; Ozdincler, Arzu Razak; Ulug, Fitnat; Guler, Serhat; Saltik, Sema; Fizyoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü
Introduction/background: The study aims to investigate the effects of the MI (Motor Imagery) program applied in addition to the PTR (Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation) program on gait and balance in children with DMD (Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy). Methods: The 38 boys with DMD were included in the study and randomized into two groups: the PTR group (mean age: 7.96 +/- 1.94 years) and the MI + PTR group (mean age: 9.03 +/- 1.71 years). In the PTR group, the PTR program was administered 2 days/week for 8 weeks, and in the MI + PTR group, the MI program was administered 5 days/week in addition to the PTR program. Groups were assessed by the Brooke Lower Extremity Functional Classification Scale, Modified Pediatric Mini Mental Scale, Movement Imagery Questionnaire (MIQc), Kinovea (R) Software Program, Timed Up & Go Test (TUG), Timed Function Tests (TFT), Two-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), and Motor Function Measure (MFM-32). Results: As a result of the study, in PTR Group, TFT-Stairs descending (p = 0.049) was improved. In MI + PTR Group, Kinovea (R) Software Program-Walking Speed (p = 0.003), 2MWT (p = 0.037), TFT-Stair descend and 10-m walk (respectively; p = 0.001; p = 0.039), and MFM-32-D1 (p = 0.036) were improved. According to the comparison between groups, the groups were not superior to each other (p > 0.05). Discussion/conclusion: Although the MI program applied in addition to the PTR program contributes to improvements in walking speed, walking distance, and functional performance in children with DMD, it does not demonstrate superiority over the PTR program alone.
Citation - Scopus: 1
Investigating the Impact of Various Insole Applications on Balance and Postural Stability in the Elderly
(Elsevier, 2025) Ozturk, Basar; Ozdincler, Arzu Razak; Kocyigit, Ahmet; Kaya, Begum Kara; Kisa, Eylul Pinar; Fizyoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü
Objectives: Aging leads to physical and cognitive declines, notably affecting balance and motor skills, making falls a prevalent health concern among the elderly. Falls, a significant health issue among the elderly, often stem from these impairments. This study aims to investigate the impact of different insole materials, specifically cork and silicone, on balance and postural stability in the elderly. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Istanbul Barinyurt Elderly Care Center with 24 participants, divided into two groups to test cork and silicone insoles. Balance parameters, plantar pressure, the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test were used as measures. Data analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests. Results: Post-intervention, the cork insole group showed significant improvements in balance, maximum plantar pressure, and functional mobility tests compared to the silicone insole group. While both insoles enhanced certain balance parameters and walking performance, cork insoles proved more effective in key outcomes. Additionally, maximum plantar pressure for the cork insoles group decreased significantly, indicating better pressure distribution and potentially enhanced balance. Conclusion: Cork insoles are superior to silicone insoles in improving balance and postural stability among the elderly. This study supports using cork insoles as part of fall prevention strategies, emphasizing the importance of material properties in orthopedic insole design. Future research should explore long-term effects and integrate insoles with other postural stability methods for comprehensive elderly care.
Measuring Shoulder Abduction Strength Using 2 Different Dynamometers: Comprehensive Intrarater and Interrater Reliability and Validity
(Turkish Assoc Orthopaedics Traumatology, 2025) Atli, Ecenur; Topaloglu, Mahir; Hosbay, Zeynep; Ozdincler, Arzu Razak; Fizyoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü
Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate the intrarater and interrater reliability of handheld dynamometer (HHD) measurements in assessing isometric muscle strength of the shoulder abductors and to compare these results with those obtained using a fixed dynamometer (FD). Methods: The study involved 25 voluntary participants, all over the age of 18, asymptomatic (with no injuries in the upper extremity), and not engaged in overhead sports. The participants were evaluated twice by 2 different testers who were experienced in orthopedic rehabilitation, at 90 degrees of shoulder abduction in the scapular plane. On the first measurement day, Tester 1 performed measurements using both HHD and FD, while on the second measurement day, both testers used only the HHD. A 3-to 7-day interval separated the 2 measurement sessions. Paired-samples t-tests were used to evaluate the systematic bias between the testers. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change were calculated. The statistical significance level was accepted as P < .05. Results: Data from 22 participants (15 women, 7 men; mean age: 23.00 +/- 3.19 years) were analyzed, as 3 individuals did not attend the final assessment. A strong correlation (r = 0.772) was found between Tester 1's HHD measurements and FD, while a similarly strong correlation (r = 0.748) was observed for Tester 2's HHD measurements. Excellent intrarater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]= 0.941) was found between Tester 1's measurements, and excellent interrater reliability (ICC= 0.889) was found between testers. Conclusion: Handheld dynamometer has demonstrated excellent interrater and intrarater reliability and high validity for assessing shoulder abductor muscle strength in research and clinical use. Since the muscle strength of testers using the HHD may influence the results, the FD may be a more appropriate option when the study population is stronger than the testers. Studies involving different clinical populations and testers with varying experience levels are needed to improve the relevance of the results. Level of Evidence: Level III, Diagnostic Study.